B. D. S., M. Sc. O. and Jassim Ali Jassim Al-E'nizy

Download 1.57 Mb.
Size1.57 Mb.
1   2   3   4

  1. To investigate whether or not there is association between the facial form and the form of the upper dental arch in adult males and females.

  2. To find out the most frequent facial type (lateral and frontal) and dental arch form in Mosuli adults.

  3. To obtain data in three dimensions (posterior-anterior and lateral) of craniofacial skeleton of Iraqi adults in Mosul city with normal class I occlusion, and to define the possible sex differences in craniofacial skeleton in the three dimensions.

Materials and Methods

The Sample:

The sample of this study involved students from Mosul University selected randomly from the following colleges (College of Dentistry, College of Law, College of Education, College of Agriculture and College of Arts). 448 clinically examined adult subjects, 100 were selected, and those who fit the criteria of clinical sample selection. Then cephalometric radiographs and impression were taken for them and only 95 (58 female 61%, 37 male 39%) were selected. The age of the sample ranged between (18 – 25) years old, They were normal healthy individuals of Mosul origin.

Criteria for Sample Specification:

  1. Full complement of permanent dentition (excluding the third molars).

  2. Bilateral Class I molar and canine occlusion

  3. There are no:

  1. History of previous orthodontic treatment.

  2. Clinical detectable massive interproximal or occlusal caries.

  3. Heavy dental restorations.

  4. Fractured or crowned teeth or fixed prosthodontic therapy.

  5. Supernumerary teeth.

  6. History of bad oral habits.

  7. Facial disharmony (deformation).

Materials and Supplies:

A- Diagnostic Instruments : Dental mirrors, Kidney dishes , Cotton & Disinfectant solution

B-Impression and Cast Materials and Instruments : Wide bladed plaster spatula ,Rubber bowel ,Upper and lower perforated plastic orthodontic trays ,Irreversible hydrocolloid impression material & Dental stone.

C-Digitizing Equipments : Sharp pen, Metal ruler, Lab Top (hp) (Pentium IV), Compact disc ,Computer scanner (hp),.Software Planmeca dimaxis program .

The History and Clinical Examination:

The selected students were asked to tell information concerning their names, ages, history and then subjected to a thorough clinical examination to reassure the fulfillment of the required sample specifications

Construction of the Study Models:

Individual impression of the both dental arches was taken while the student was seated on a dental chair after instructing him / her about the procedure in order to cooperate with the researcher.

The Radiographic Technique:

Under standardized condition, two digital Cephalometrics were taken for each selected subject, one for lateral view and the other for frontal view. The subject was set in a standing position with his head fixed by two ear rods laterally and a locking nasal positioner was then secured against the bridge of the patient's nose to eliminate the possibility of rotation around ear rods in the sagittal plane and for future reference in subsequent exposures. Also it acts as a ruler caliber for the measurement to avoid magnification in the image, so the Frankfort horizontal plane is kept parallel to the floor. The subject was in centric occlusion during exposure.

The Landmarks:

1-Incisal Point: The midway point between the incisal edges of the two central incisors .

2-Canine Point: The cusp tip of the right and left permanent canines .

3- First Molars Point: The mesiobuccal cusp tip of the right and left permanent first molars .

4- Second Molars Point: The distobuccal cusp tip of the right and left second permanent molars .

Dental Arch Dimensions

Linear distances were measured on the copy of the study models for the maxillary dental arches to determine the dental arch width and length.

The linear dimensions are: (Figure 3)

  1. Dental Arch Width

The breadth of dental arch is determined by measuring distance between the corresponding contralateral teeth Daskalogiannakis (2000)that includes:

1-Intercanine Distance (ICD): The linear distance between the cusp tip of the right and left permanent canines ( Warren and Bishara, 2001; Murad, 2008).

2-Inter First Molar Distance (IMD): The linear distance between the mesiobuccal cusp tip of the right and left permanent first molars (Salem, 2003).

3-Inter Second Molar Distance (I2MD); the linear distance between the distobuccal cusp tip of the right and left permanent second molars (Al-Shalabi, 2002).

B. Dental Arch Length:

1-Anterior Arch Length (Canine Vertical Distance) (C.V.D):

The vertical distance from the incisal point perpendicular to the intercanine distance at the cusp tip (Salem, 2003).

2-Posterior Arch Length (Molar Vertical Distance) (M.V.D):

The vertical distance from the incisal point perpendicular to the intermolar distance at the mesiobuccal cusp tip of permanent first molars (Ramdan, 2000; Salem, 2003).

3-Total Arch Length (TAL):

The vertical distance from the incisal point to the line joining the distobuccal cusp tips of the second permanent molars (Al-Shalabi, 2002).

Anterior arch length

Total arch length

Molar – vertical distance

Inter – canine distance

Inter – first molar distance

Inter – second molar distance

Figure (3) Dental Arch Measurements

Dental Arch Form: The size and shape of the arches have considerable implications in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning, affecting the space available, dental esthetics, and stability of the dentition (Uysala et al, 2005).

Computer Analysis of the Study Models

The models were directly placed on the glass window of the flat bed computer scanner with a metal ruler (Haralabakis et al , 2006). Distortion caused by the scanning procedure was corrected by the use of metal ruler that was scanned with each dental cast then corrected automatically by the software Dimaxis program (Mutinelli et al, 2004).

Figure(4) Scanning of the Dental Cast

Lateral Cephalometric Landmarks:

The following landmarks were used in this study

  1. Point N (Nasion): The most anterior point of nasofrontal suture in the midsagittal plane.

  2. Point Or (Orbitale): The lowest point in the inferior margin of the orbit.

  3. Point Po (Anatomical Porion): The highest point on the bony external acoustic meatus.

  4. Point ANS (Anterior Nasal Spine): The anterior tip of the sharp bony process of the maxilla at the lower margin of the anterior nasal opening .

  5. Point Ba (Basion): The lowest point on the anterior rim of the foramen magnum in the mid-sagittal plane.

  6. Directory: uploaded files -> docs
    docs -> Different runways for edentulous areas
    docs -> Manuscript type: Review article Title
    docs -> Clinical comparison of conventional free gingival graft and its modification for the treatment of gingival recession defects. A case study
    docs -> Effects of Al2O3
    docs -> Rehabilitation of severely atrophied mandibular ridge with neutral zone technique. A case report
    docs -> Apert’s Syndrome –Unusual cause of syndactyly Dr Vishal Mago
    docs -> Clinical Evaluation Of The Efficacy Of Orthal- forte (Prolytic Enzymes, Trypsin And Chymotrypsin) On Postoperative Sequel Following The Removal Of Lower Impacted Third Molar Prof. Dr. Tahani Abdul- aziz Al- sandook* Dr
    docs -> DR. dr. Nishi tanwar asstt. Professor deptt. Of periodonticcs pgids rohtak haryana
    docs -> The Effect of Different Mouth Washes on the Metallic Ion Release from Cobalt-Chromium Alloy Denture Base Material
    docs -> Influence of Extraction Socket Class on Success of Post Extraction Implant: a clinical Study

    Share with your friends:
1   2   3   4

The database is protected by copyright ©dentisty.org 2019
send message

    Main page