Columns: Editorial Dento-maxillofacial radiology as a specialty Kamburoğlu K. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology
Kıvanç Kamburoğlu, Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, 06560 Ankara, Turkey
Author contributions:Kamburoğlu K wrote the paper.
Conflict-of-interest: Kamburoğlu K declares no conflict of interest.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Correspondence to:Kıvanç Kamburoğlu, DDS, MSc, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Dögol Caddesi, 06560 Ankara, Turkey. email@example.com
Received: November 7, 2014
Peer-review started: November 8, 2014
First decision: January 8, 2015
Revised: January 12, 2015
Accepted: April 16, 2015
Article in press:
Published online: Abstract
This editorial discusses a relatively new specialty in dental and medical field namely dentomaxillofacial radiology. As a relatively newborn specialty it is obvious that there is a long way to go before dentomaxillofacial radiology is commonly known and respected by the society. All over the world, assigned committees work on the development of the training curriculum, determination of scientific and physical standards for institutions offering specialty training and arrangement of dental codes for reimbursement issues. Furthermore, adjustment of educational, scientific and legal regulations and prospective benefits are expected to boost this specialty’s attractiveness to colleagues’ worldwide.
Dento-maxillofacial Radiology is one of the dental specialties recognized under different names and divisions by around forty countries in the world. Diagnostic imaging techniques have always been a tremendous asset in clinical dentistry. Since the early 1900s, dental faculties in developed world have been engaged in teaching Oral Radiology. It includes, intra-oral imaging, dental panoramic imaging, cephalometric imaging, sialography, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), multislice medical computed tomography (MSCT), ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET) and Nuclear Medicine. Also, application of computer aided and image guided procedures with Haptic and Robotic devices are in progress. In addition, visible light, optical coherence tomography, and terahertz imaging are other methods in use or under development[3,4].
Intraoral imaging, continues to provide the best spatial resolution of any imaging method currently available. Also, panoramic radiography is a commonly used two-dimensional technique which gives the broad view of both jaws without the detail offered by the intraoral images. In response to the high demand for a technique that could provide three-dimensional data at a lower cost and with lower radiation doses than the conventional CT used in medical radiology, CBCT was developed specifically for dento-maxillofacial imaging. A spate of revolutionary CBCT applications reached the dental market in the 2000s, marking the beginning of a new era in the field of dento-maxillofacial radiology. New technological specifications and settings include multiple field of views (FOVs) and voxels that can better address a variety of specific tasks. There are also several hybrid machines offering CBCT imaging along with panoramic and cephalometric radiography. CBCT has come into common use for a variety of purposes in the fields of endodontics, dental implantology, dento-maxillofacial surgery and orthodontics.
On the other hand, scientists have also been searching for safer and comparable alternative imaging modalities to X-ray imaging due to increasing concerns regarding radiation dose and economic limitations. In this context, MRI and ultrasonography were introduced and now widely utilized for a variety of tasks in medicine. MRI is a powerful and versatile imaging modality and most work in the field of dental MRI aimed at imaging soft tissues and imaging of the morphology and function of the temporomandibular joint. Recent development of the Ultrasonography (US) equipment enables the visualization of fine detail of the surface structure of the oral and maxillofacial tissues without the use of ionizing radiation. In the field of dentistry, US technique can be used in clinical practice for bone and superficial soft tissue examination, major salivary gland or duct stone and salivary gland lesion detection, temporomandibular joint imaging, detection of fractures and vascular lesions, lymph node examination, measurement of the thickness of muscles and visualization of vessels of the neck including the carotid for atherosclerotic plaques. More recently, development of three-dimensional US imaging allowed multiplanar reformatting, volume rendering and color power doppler (CPD). In endodontics, CPD is used in the evaluation of periapical lesions and follow up of periapical bone healing and for differentiation between vital and root filled teeth. US imaging is also used to guide fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in the neck with the advantage of low cost, ease of usage and radiation safety. Ultrasound provides a number of advantages for dento-maxillofacial imaging when compared to other advanced imaging modalities such as; absence of harmful ionizing radiation, portability, possibility of dynamic and repeated examinations and relatively low cost.
Depending on the imaged area, diagnostic images obtained from the dento-maxillofacial region may show part or the entire nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses, airway, cervical vertebrae and temporal bone. Finally, even when scans are taken for primarily unrelated reasons, assessment of the all imaged area, should always be performed in order to rule out any significant pathological changes. Incidental findings require follow-up, and further treatment options may be identified in conjunction with clinical findings, including referral to a specialist not directly linked to the field of dentistry, where appropriate.
As a relatively newborn specialty it is obvious that there is a long way to go before dento-maxillofacial radiology is commonly known and respected by the society. All over the world, assigned committees work on the development of the training curriculum, determination of scientific and physical standards for institutions offering specialty training and arrangement of dental codes for reimbursement issues. Furthermore, adjustment of educational, scientific and legal regulations and prospective benefits are expected to boost this specialty’s attractiveness to colleagues’ worldwide.
1 Ruprecht A. The status of oral and maxillofacial radiology worldwide in 2007. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009; 38: 98-103 [PMID: 19176652 DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/30358437]
2 Morimoto Y, Oda M, Kito S, Tanaka T, Wakasugi-Sato N, Matsumoto-Takeda S, Nishimura S, Koga H. Clinical Applications of Current and Advanced Diagnostic Imaging Modalities for Oral Diseases. J Radiol Radiat Ther 2014; 2: 1027
3 Kamburoğlu K, Kurt H, Kolsuz E, Öztaş B, Tatar I, Çelik HH. Occlusal caries depth measurements obtained by five different imaging modalities. J Digit Imaging 2011; 24: 804-813 [PMID: 21116675 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-010-9355-9]
4 Kamburoğlu K, Yetimoĝlu NÖ, Altan H. Characterization of primary and permanent teeth using terahertz spectroscopy. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2014; 43: 20130404 [PMID: 24940807 DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20130404]
5 Acar B, Kamburoğlu K. Use of cone beam computed tomography in periodontology. World J Radiol 2014; 6: 139-147 [PMID: 24876918 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v6.i5.139]
6 Yetimoglu NÖ, Kamburoglu K. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Dentistry. OMICS J Radiology 2014; 3: e125 [DOI: 10.4172/2167-7964.1000e125]
7 Kamburoğlu K, Kursun ES. Appications of Ultrasonography in Dentistry. OMICS J Radiology 2013; 2: e114 [DOI: 10.4172/2167-7964.1000e114]
P-Reviewer: Li YZ, Nouh MR, Vinh-Hung V S-Editor:Tian YL