SE adhesives and bur selection and lubrication
Composite Material Treatment Planning
Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations. Toledano, M; et al. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:610-5.
Microleakage in Class II Resin Composite Restorations with Various Adhesive/ Liner Combinations: An In Vitro Study. Neme, et al. Oral Health Journal. April 2003.
Simulated oral environment and microleakage of Class II resin-based composite and sandwich restorations. Besnault C, Attal JP. Am J Dent. 2003 Jun;16(3):186-90.
The effect of flowable resin composites as gingival incfrements on the microleakage of posterior resin composites. Attar N, Turgut MD, Gungor HC. Oper Dent 2004;29:162-167.
Dietschi D, Herzfeld D. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II resin composite restorations after thermal and occlusal stressing. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998;106:1033-42.
The microleakage in open-sandwich class II restorations. Florita, Z. et al. European Cells and Materials Vol 11. Suppl.2.2006(page 23)
adhesive restoratives is their limited durability in vivo.”
Intact hybrid layers created by a simplified etch-and-rinse adhesive in caries-affected primary dentin partially disappeared after 6 months of intraoral function
Demineralizing dentin is like opening the Pandora’s box, releasing endogenous enzymes
(Matrix Metalloproteinases - MMPs) that were trapped within the mineralized dentin matrix.
In the presence of water (such as that derived from water sorption or from adhesives, MMPs can breakdown collagen fibrils that are not protected by intrafibrillar minerals
Direct Composite Matrices