Use of dentomaxillofacial cone beam computed tomography in dentistry



Download 33.37 Kb.
Date conversion22.11.2016
Size33.37 Kb.




Use of dentomaxillofacial cone beam computed tomography in dentistry
Kıvanç Kamburoğlu

CITATION

Kamburoğlu K. Use of dentomaxillofacial cone beam computed tomography in dentistry. World J Radiol 2015; 7(6): 128-130

URL

http://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v7/i6/128.htm

DOI

http://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v7.i6.128

OPEN ACCESS

This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

CORE TIP

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is now commonly used for a variety of purposes in oral implantology, dento-maxillofacial surgery, image-guided surgical procedures, endodontics, periodontics and orthodontics. CBCT applications provide obvious benefits in the assessment of dentomaxillofacial region, however; it should be used only in correct indications considering the necessity and the potential hazards of the examination.

KEY WORDS

Radiography; Dentistry; Dentomaxillofacial; Radiology; Cone-beam computed tomography

COPYRIGHT

© The Author(s) 2015. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

COPYRIGHT LICENSE

Order reprints or request permissions: bpgoffice@wjgnet.com

NAME OF JOURNAL

World Journal of Radiology

ISSN

1949-8470 (online)

PUBLISHER

Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 8226 Regency Drive, Pleasanton, CA 94588, USA

WEBSITE

http://www.wjgnet.com


ESPS Manuscript NO: 15805

Columns: EDITORIAL


Use of dentomaxillofacial cone beam computed tomography in dentistry

Kıvanç Kamburoğlu

Kıvanç Kamburoğlu, Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, 06500 Beşevler, Ankara, Turkey

Author contributions: Kamburoğlu K wrote the paper.

Correspondence to: Kıvanç Kamburoğlu, DDS, MSc, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Emniyet Mah. İncitaş Sok., 06500 Beşevler, Ankara, Turkey. dtkivo@yahoo.com

Telephone: +90-312-2965632 Fax: +90-312-2123954

Received: December 9, 2014 Revised: April 21, 2015 Accepted: May 5, 2015

Published online: June 28, 2015


Abstract

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was deve­loped and introduced specifically for dento-maxillofacial imaging. CBCT possesses a number of advantages over medical CT in clinical practice, such as lower effective radiation doses, lower costs, fewer space requirements, easier image acquisition, and interactive display modes such as mutiplanar reconstruction that are applicable to maxillofacial imaging. However, the disadvantages of CBCT include higher doses than two-dimensional imaging; the inability to accurately represent the internal structure of soft tissues and soft-tissue lesions; a limited correlation with Hounsfield Units for standardized quantification of bone density; and the presence of various types of image artifacts, mainly those produced by metal restorations. CBCT is now commonly used for a variety of purposes in oral implantology, dento-maxillofacial surgery, image-guided surgical procedures, endodontics, periodontics and orthodontics. CBCT applications provide obvious benefits in the assessment of dentomaxillofacial region, however; it should be used only in correct indications considering the necessity and the potential hazards of the examination.


Key words: Radiography; Dentistry; Dentomaxillofacial; Radiology; Cone-beam computed tomography
© The Author(s) 2015. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Kamburoğlu K. Use of dentomaxillofacial cone beam computed tomography in dentistry. World J Radiol 2015; 7(6): 128-130 Available from: URL: http://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v7/i6/128.htm DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v7.i6.128
Core tip: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is now commonly used for a variety of purposes in oral implantology, dento-maxillofacial surgery, image-guided surgical procedures, endodontics, periodontics and orthodontics. CBCT applications provide obvious benefits in the assessment of dentomaxillofacial region, however; it should be used only in correct indications considering the necessity and the potential hazards of the examination.
CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was developed and introduced specifically for dento-maxillofacial imaging[1]. A practical cone-beam algorithm for tomo­graphic reconstruction of 2-D projection data was first illustrated by Feldkamp in 1984, who, used a back-projection formula to directly reconstruct a 3-D density function from a set of two-dimensional projections. CBCT units dedicated to dento-maxillofacial radiology could not be marketed for another 15 years because economic X-ray tubes, high-quality detector systems and sufficiently powerful personal computers were unavailable. Eventually, in 1999, the first dento-maxi­llofacial CBCT unit, the NewTom DVT 9000, designed by Attilio Tacconi and Piero Mozzo and produced by QR, Inc. of Verona, Italy, was introduced in Europe[2,3]. Today, new technological specifications and settings include multiple field of views (FOVs) and voxels that can better address a variety of specific tasks. There are also several hybrid machines offering CBCT imaging along with panoramic and cephalometric radiography. CBCT possesses a number of advantages over medical CT in clinical practice, such as lower effective radiation doses, lower costs, fewer space requirements, easier image acquisition, and interactive display modes such as mutiplanar reconstruction that are applicable to maxillofacial imaging. However, the disadvantages of CBCT include higher doses than two-dimensional imaging; the inability to accurately represent the internal structure of soft tissues and soft-tissue lesions; a limited correlation with Hounsfield Units for standardized quantification of bone density; and the presence of various types of image artifacts, mainly those produced by metal restorations[4-6].

CBCT is now commonly used for a variety of purposes in oral implantology, dento-maxillofacial surgery, image-guided surgical procedures, endodontics, periodontics and orthodontics. Whereas early CBCT devices were dedicated to implantology and dental imaging, today, applications extend to the face and skull base as a whole. Depending on the FOV used, CBCT images may show part or all of the nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses, airway, cervical vertebrae and temporal bone. In fact, specific ear, nose and throat imaging programs have been increasingly included in CBCT systems, suggesting that CBCT may at some point entirely replace medical CT imaging in certain otolaryngology-related applications[3]. CBCT has also been found to provide reliable and accurate 3D analysis of the upper airway that can be of help in assessing the presence and severity of obstructive sleep apnea[7]. Imaging of the temporal bone represents another promising area for CBCT, whose high-resolution and nearly artifact-free multi-planar reconstruction images make it possible to precisely assess the intra-cochlear position of the electrode, including visualization of each individual contact[8].

Concerns over liability issues related to CBCT remain unresolved. CBCT machines are increasingly being marketed specifically to orthodontists and implantologists or dentists who place implants in private practices. Unlike other advanced medical imaging systems, CBCT scanners are generally owned and operated by non-radiologists who lack the training necessary to interpret CBCT images. However, clinicians who order CBCT scans are responsible for interpreting the entire image volume, given the possibility that incidental findings - the likelihood of which increase when a larger head volume is included in the scan - may have significant health consequences for the patient[6]. There is no informed consent process or signature waiver that would allow the clinician to interpret only a specific area of an image volume. As a result, the clinician may be considered liable for a missed diagnosis, even one that falls outside the area of his/her expertise. In case of any questions regarding image data interpretation, referral to a specialist in oral and maxillofacial or medical radiology is recommended[6,9].

CBCT applications provide obvious benefits in the assessment of dentomaxillofacial region, however; it should be used only in correct indications considering the necessity and the potential hazards of the examination. Comparative radiation dosages should be weighed against diagnostic benefits in selecting the appropriate imaging modality for specific purposes. Future improve­ments in CBCT imaging can be expected to result in novel systems with better diagnostic abilities and lower effective doses[10].
REFERENCES

1 Angelopoulos C, Scarfe WC, Farman AG. A comparison of maxillofacial CBCT and medical CT. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2012; 20: 1-17 [PMID: 22365427 DOI: 10.1016/j.cxom.2011.12.008]

2 Miracle AC, Mukherji SK. Conebeam CT of the head and neck, part 1: physical principles. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 1088-1095 [PMID: 19439484 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1653]

3 Miracle AC, Mukherji SK. Conebeam CT of the head and neck, part 2: clinical applications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 1285-1292 [PMID: 19461061 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1654]

4 Acar B, Kamburoğlu K. Use of cone beam computed tomography in periodontology. World J Radiol 2014; 6: 139-147 [PMID: 24876918 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v6.i5.139]

5 Scarfe WC, Li Z, Aboelmaaty W, Scott SA, Farman AG. Maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography: essence, elements and steps to interpretation. Aust Dent J 2012; 57 Suppl 1: 46-60 [PMID: 22376097 DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01657.x]

6 Benavides E, Rios HF, Ganz SD, An CH, Resnik R, Reardon GT, Feldman SJ, Mah JK, Hatcher D, Kim MJ, Sohn DS, Palti A, Perel ML, Judy KW, Misch CE, Wang HL. Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists consensus report. Implant Dent 2012; 21: 78-86 [PMID: 22382748 DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31824885b5]

7 Enciso R, Nguyen M, Shigeta Y, Ogawa T, Clark GT. Comparison of cone-beam CT parameters and sleep questionnaires in sleep apnea patients and control subjects. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 109: 285-293 [PMID: 20123412 DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.09.033]

8 Ruivo J, Mermuys K, Bacher K, Kuhweide R, Offeciers E, Casselman JW. Cone beam computed tomography, a low-dose imaging technique in the postoperative assessment of cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 2009; 30: 299-303 [PMID: 19174709 DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31819679f9]

9 Wright B. Contemporary medico-legal dental radiology. Aust Dent J 2012; 57 Suppl 1: 9-15 [PMID: 22376092 DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01653.x]

10 Senel B, Kamburoglu K, Uçok O, Yüksel SP, Ozen T, Avsever H. Diagnostic accuracy of different imaging modalities in detection of proximal caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010; 39: 501-511 [PMID: 21062944 DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/28628723]
Footnotes

P- Reviewer: Galiatsatos AA, Kanzaki H, Li YZ, Peker I, Rattan V S- Editor: Ji FF L- Editor: A E- Editor: Liu SQ

Conflict-of-interest: The Author declares no conflict of interest.

Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Peer-review started: December 11, 2014



First decision: January 8, 2015

Article in press: May 6, 2015


The database is protected by copyright ©dentisty.org 2016
send message

    Main page