Butterworth has steadfastly disputed the idea, put forth by critics, that he has written a lofty "State of England" play — one that pits creeping conformity, homogeneity and modernity against a rebellious, fantastical heritage swathed in English traditions, and embodied by Byron; a play which asks which direction the nation is heading. But neither does he reject the various interpretations of his text that have cropped up. Critics have compared Byron — who is debauched, decadent and pathetic in turns, but is also brave, principled in his way, nature-loving and dedicated to an idea that life is meant to be lived — to a play's worth of fictional antecedents. Among these are Falstaff (hedonistic, unapologetic, boozily philosophical), the Pied Piper (an enchanted leader of youths) and Fagin (a more unscrupulous sort of father figure). The writer has no objections on all counts.
"I think there are so many" possible comparisons, he said. "If you tap into a spirit, a defiant spirit, it's going to chime with other renderings of that. Funny enough, I wasn't really that familiar with Henry IV, Part I & II. I checked it out closely after writing the play. I think there certainly are some similarities. But I think there's a cowardice in Falstaff that you can't identify in Johnny Byron."
As for the character's loaded name, some have thought of it as a reference to Lord Byron, the English poet, and one of the more sybaritic, romantic and dangerous figures in English history. (He also had a clubfoot, which is echoed by Rooster's limp.) But no dice. "There was a guy called Byron in a village in Suffolk in the early '70s when I was very small," tells Butterworth. "He was a very out-of-control, otherworldly character, and he just stuck with me as a name. I kind of resisted calling him that just because of Lord Byron. But in the end I went with it, because once a name sticks, it sticks. And I don't mind the overtones."
Byron was, in fact, based on a number of characters Butterworth has known over the years. Aside from the bloke mentioned above, one was a man he knew in a village in Wiltshire. Once, he charged into him by mistake, and remembers it being "like walking into a tree." A while later, after teaming with him in a victorious pool match, he picked him up "and he was light as a feather. He could change from one thing to another."
This corresponds to Butterworth's view of Byron. "I think what's most interesting is that he keeps changing. He's a very slippery character."
An 1824 portrait of Lord Byron by Thomas Phillips
He also keeps changing hats. In one scene in the Broadway production, Mark Rylance is wearing an aviator's leather cap and goggles. In another, an old military helmet. And in another, a hat with animal ears that makes him look like the satyr he truly is. But that was none of Butterworth's doing. "In the script he's just wearing different costumes," he said. "But Mark's just got a massive collection of hats. And I think he chose what he chose. We talked about it a bit, but not too much."
Butterworth also explained that the town where the play is set, Flintock — and the Flintock Fair, which takes place during the play — are fictional. Flintock is based on the village of Pewsey, where Butterworth lived for a time.
Finally, there's the title. "Jerusalem," which uses as its text a short poem by William Blake called "And did those feet in ancient time," set to music by Sir Hubert Parry in 1916, is one of the most anthemic of English national songs. The poem was inspired by the apocryphal myth that Jesus visited England during his days on Earth. "I always loved the song," explained Butterworth. "It's the type of song that, if you go to a wedding and sing six hymns, it's the one that will stand your hair on end. It's really powerful. It's full of questions, of course. It's full of wonder and unanswered questions, which is exciting. The decision to call it Jerusalem is a kind of a bold move. It's a totemic title. It's takes balls to call it that. It fits it well. I think Blake's song and my play are both celebrations and lamentations at the same time of a lost state."
Ironically, the play that is called Jerusalem and is (arguably) about England, was written in New York City. "I had a draft of it before," said the writer. "I was in New York producing a film in 2009. But It was really written in New York out of necessity. It was already April-May. And we were supposed to start rehearsing in June. I have to kind of work at night, and quite fast. But it came together fairly well. Deadlines can either freeze you up or free you." So can 1,000 years of history. Just ask Rooster.