Guidelines for ajo-do systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses



Download 78 Kb.
Date01.02.2017
Size78 Kb.
Guidelines for AJO-DO Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

July, 2011


These guidelines are provided to help authors prepare systematic reviews and meta-analyses according to contemporary standards. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses submitted to the AJO-DO will be screened for compliance with these guidelines, including PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) documentation. These guidelines are supplemental to those for Original Articles.

Guide for Authors
1. See the article “The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies that Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanations and Elaboration,” as well as the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses should be conducted using these two documents as guides.

(http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1000100) (http://www.cochrane-handbook.org/)


2. Address all items in the PRISMA checklist as completely as possible in the text of the submission. (For submissions without quantitative analyses such as forest plots, some items on the PRISMA checklist may not be applicable.)
3. Download the PRISMA checklist. For each item on the checklist, enter the corresponding page number(s) on the form. If items on the PRISMA checklist do not apply to your submission, write N/A in the space for the page number. Use the page numbering feature in your word processing program to keep numbers consistent throughout the review process. Include the completed PRISMA checklist when you submit your article to the AJO-DO.

(http://www.prisma-statement.org/2.1.2%20-%20PRISMA%202009%20Checklist.pdf)


4. With respect to the PRISMA checklist and guidelines, please ensure that submissions are correctly identified as systematic reviews or meta-analyses (Item 1), and that a structured summary is provided (Item 2). Additionally, all components of PICOS (participants or population, intervention, comparisons or controls, outcome, and study design) should be clearly specified (Items 4 and 6). Pay special attention to Items 7 - 11 from the Methods section, as well as Items 17, 18, 19, and 20 from the Results section. Items 13, 14, 16, 21, and 23 should be carefully reported when meta-analyses are performed.
5. Download the PRISMA flow diagram and insert the appropriate numbers based on your searches and inclusion/exclusion criteria.

(http://www.prisma-statement.org/2.1.4%20-%20PRISMA%20Flow%202009%20Diagram.pdf)


6. Manuscripts not meeting these guidelines may be rejected or returned to the authors for correction and/or modification prior to initiation of the review process.

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

August 1, 2011
Directory: data -> promis misc
data -> Department of Health and Human Services Population Health Public and Environmental Health
data -> Parks Victoria Technical Paper Series No. 61 Victorian Intertidal Reef Monitoring Program: The Intertidal Reef Biota of Central Victoria’s Marine Protected Areas
promis misc -> Guide for Authors Journal scope and general principles Dental Cadmos
promis misc -> Confirmation of authorship form
promis misc -> The book is divided into four parts: an introduction, radiographic anatomy, radiographic evidence of pathology and obtaining diagnostic dental radiographs
promis misc -> The book is divided into four parts: an introduction, radiographic anatomy, radiographic evidence of pathology and obtaining diagnostic dental radiographs
promis misc -> Journals reviewed
promis misc -> Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders An International Journal
promis misc -> Metagenomics and the molecular identification of novel viruses
promis misc -> Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology hipaa authorization to Disclose Protected Health Information


Share with your friends:


The database is protected by copyright ©dentisty.org 2019
send message

    Main page