Different runways for edentulous areas

Download 176.79 Kb.
Size176.79 Kb.


  1. Dr. Gunjan Gupta (P.G. Student)

A.M.E`S Dental College,

Dept. of Prosthodontics,


Contact no.- 8585902828

e-mail i.d.- aagunjangupta@gmail.com

  1. Dr. Varun Goyal

Senior Resident

MDS Orthodontics

PGIDS Rohtak

Contact no-07838683317

Email id:-varungoyal29@gmail.com

  1. Dr. Anil Kadian

PG student

Dept of orthodontics

PGIDS rohtak


The success of a removable partial denture depends on the careful evaluation of patient, proper treatment plan and an organised design sequence. Designing a removable partial denture is often a daunting task for a clinician. The two main difficulties encountered are 1) to obtain suitable retention and 2) stability of denture to horizontal and vertical displacement.1

The completed design serves as a blueprint for removable partial denture construction. Therefore utmost care must be taken while designing a prosthesis.2 The mechanical characteristics of removable partial denture must be considered. Components must be neatly drawn and accurately positioned.

Key words: removable partial denture, Kennedy`s classification, designing.


Any prosthesis that replaces some teeth in a partially dentate arch. It can be removed from the mouth and replaced at will.3 Removable partial dentures are removable prosthesis and hence not connected to the teeth or tissues rigidly. The design of a removable partial denture should incorporate not only easy removal and placement but also stability when subjected to functional loads such as mastication. Therefore when a removable partial prosthesis is considered for restoration of the missing teeth, the design of RPD is a problem. This is due to the quite difference in the displacements between the periodontal soft tissues of abutments and residual ridge mucosa.4 Proper designing is therefore essential to prevent any deleterious effect on the supporting structure.1


The correct design should be based on the mechanical and biological principles.

The basic principles given by dr. A.H. Schimdt includes:

1. Thorough knowledge of mechanical and biological principles.

2.Treatment plan based on complete examination and diagnosis.

3.Correlation of factors and proper plan of the treatment.

4. Restore form and function without injury to the oral tissues.

5.It is a form of treatment not cure.2

Mechanical principles:

The control of potentially damaging forces is the primary goal of a removable partial denture design. When subjected to intraoral forces, a removable partial denture can perform the action of 2 simple machines:the Lever and Inclined plane.2

Lever: A lever is a rigid bar supported somewhere along its length. The support point of the lever is called the fulcrum, and the lever can move around the fulcrum.5

Levers can be of three types namely:

1st - order levers

IInd - order levers

IIIrd - order levers 5
1st - order levers: In this lever the fulcrum is in the center, resistance is at one end and effort (force) is at the other .These levers are more efficient and easily controlled. This type of lever can occur in patients with distal extension partial dentures.2 The direct retainer will be the fulcrum, effort end lies on the point where the denture takes up the occlusal load (area where the artificial teeth are located) the load is the region of the anterior end of the major connector .

IInd - order levers: In this lever, the fulcrum is at one end, effort is at the opposite end and resistance or load is the center. This type of lever action occurs in indirect retention of a removable partial denture. When a displacing force tends to lift a denture from one end (effort), the anterior most point of the major connector will act as the axis of rotation (fulcrum), the intermediate zone of the denture, which is lifted by the force, will form the resistance (load) of the lever.

IIIrd - order levers: In this lever, the fulcrum is at one end, resistance is at the opposite end and effort is at the center e.g. tweezers. This type of lever action does not occur in partial dentures.

Inclined plane: Inclined plane is nothing but two inclined surfaces in close alignment to one another. When a force is applied against an inclined plane it may produce two actions:

  • Deflection of object, which is applying the force (Denture).

  • Movement of the inclined plane itself (tooth).

During the rest seat preparation, the floor of the seat must be inclined slightly towards the centre of the tooth. The enclosed angle formed by a line dropped down the proximal surface of the tooth parallel to the long axis of the tooth and the floor of the rest seat must be less than 90 degrees so that the transmitted occlusal forces can be directed along the vertical axis of the tooth. An angle greater than 90 degree will not yield the desired axial loading and will produce an inclined plane effect. This in turn will produce slippage of the prosthesis away from the abutment teeth. In addition, it can cause orthodontic movement of the abutment tooth and concurrent pain and bone loss.2

Philosophy of design:

There are three basic, underlying approaches to distributing the forces acting on a partial denture between the soft tissue and the teeth.

1.Stress equalization: The resiliency of the tooth secured by the periodontal ligament in an apical direction is not comparable to the greater resiliency and displaceability of the mucosa covering the edentulous ridge. Because of this great disparity, forces are transmitted to the abutment teeth as the denture bases are displaced in function.

A rigid connection between the denture bases and the direct retainer on the abutment teeth is damaging and that some type of stress director or stress equalizer is essential to protect the vulnerable abutment teeth.2

2.Physiologic basing: This philosophy of design denies the necessity of using stress directors to equalize the disparity of vertical movement between the tooth and mucosa. The belief is that the equalization can best and most simply be accomplished by some form of physiologic basing, or lining, of the denture base.

The physiologic basing is produced either by displacing or depressing the ridge mucosa during the impression making procedure or by relining the denture base after it has been constructed . 2

3.Broad stress distribution : Advocates of this school of partial denture design believe that excessive trauma to the remaining teeth and residual ridge can be prevented by distributing the forces of occlusion over as many teeth and as much of the available soft tissue area as possible. This is accomplished by the use of additional rests, indirect retainers, clasps, and broad coverage denture bases. 2

Different design options: Table


A properly designed RPD in combination with a well planned comprehensive treatment will contribute to the preservation of the remaining teeth, bone and gingiva by maintaining the gingiva, tooth position and occlusion. It will also improve mastication and speech and enhance appearance.

The emphasis is on design as it is one of the major weak link in the process of total care. The results of a detailed clinical and radiographic examination should dictate the ultimate design of the prosthesis.


  1. Meena A. Aras Kennedy Mascarenhas. Designing options for mandibular unilateral distal extension removable partial dentures. JIPS 2009; 9(4):223-226.

  2. Stewart, clinical removable partial prosthodontics, 2nd edi, 2000 ; India.

  3. Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms-8.

  4. Ra`ed Omar Abu Hantash, Abu Yunis Mohammed H. Distal extension bases. Removable partial dentures. JIPS 2009;9(4):186-189.

  5. McCracken’s removable partial prosthodontics; 10th edition , 1997 U.S.A .


fig.1 Anteroposterior palatal strap

fig.2 Lingual plate
fig.3 I-bar
fig.4 Embrasure clasp

c:\users\vivan gupta\desktop\pics\rpd designing\dsc03836 (3).jpg fig.1

c:\users\vivan gupta\desktop\pics\rpd designing\dsc03837 (2).jpg fig.2

c:\users\vivan gupta\desktop\pics\rpd designing\dsc03839.jpg fig.3

f:\dcim\101msdcf\dsc03841.jpg fig.4

Kennedy`s classification

Major Connector

Direct Retainer

Indirect retainer

Class 1 and 2

  1. Anteroposterior palatal strap (fig.1)

  2. Complete palate

  3. Lingual plate (fig.2)

  4. Double lingual bar

  1. Reverse circlet clasp

  2. I bar (fig.3)

  1. Lingual plating (fig.2)

  2. Embrasure clasp (fig.4)

Class 3

  1. Palatal strap

  2. Anteroposterior palatal bar

  3. Anteroposterior palatal strap

  1. Circlet clasp

  2. Reverse circlet clasp

  3. I bar

Embrasure clasp

Class 4

  1. Horseshoe

  2. closed horseshoe

  3. Complete palate

  4. Lingual bar

  5. Labial bar

  1. Reverse

circlet clasp

2. I bar

Embrasure clasp

Directory: uploaded files -> docs
docs -> Manuscript type: Review article Title
docs -> Clinical comparison of conventional free gingival graft and its modification for the treatment of gingival recession defects. A case study
docs -> Effects of Al2O3
docs -> Rehabilitation of severely atrophied mandibular ridge with neutral zone technique. A case report
docs -> Apert’s Syndrome –Unusual cause of syndactyly Dr Vishal Mago
docs -> Clinical Evaluation Of The Efficacy Of Orthal- forte (Prolytic Enzymes, Trypsin And Chymotrypsin) On Postoperative Sequel Following The Removal Of Lower Impacted Third Molar Prof. Dr. Tahani Abdul- aziz Al- sandook* Dr
docs -> DR. dr. Nishi tanwar asstt. Professor deptt. Of periodonticcs pgids rohtak haryana
docs -> The Effect of Different Mouth Washes on the Metallic Ion Release from Cobalt-Chromium Alloy Denture Base Material
docs -> Influence of Extraction Socket Class on Success of Post Extraction Implant: a clinical Study
docs -> XBashar A. Tawfeeq – ficms. MaxFacs xRawaaYounus Al-Rawee – msc. Moms. Rcpsg

Share with your friends:

The database is protected by copyright ©dentisty.org 2019
send message

    Main page