Appendix A: Studies Excluded After Full Review Reason for exclusion



Download 220.86 Kb.
Page1/3
Date conversion04.06.2018
Size220.86 Kb.
  1   2   3

Appendix A: Studies Excluded After Full Review

Reason for exclusion

Author

Year

Journal

Title

1

Liu et al

2014

Indian J Ortho

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using unilateral pedicle screw fixation plus contralateral translaminar facet screw fixation in lumbar degenerative diseases

1

Tian et al

2014

JSDT

Computer-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion May Be Better than Open Surgery for Treating Degenerative Lumbar Disease

1

Niesche

2014

Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery

Percutaneous pedicle screw and rod fixation with TLIF in a series of 14 patients with recurrent lumbardisc herniation

1

Kang et al

2014

Biomedical Research International

Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation: Comparison between Primary and Revision Surgery

1

Lin et al

2014

World Neurosurgery

Unilateral Approach for Bilateral Foramen Decompression in Minimally Invasive TransforaminalInterbody Fusion

1

Zhu et al

2014

ANZ J Surg. 

Long-term clinical outcomes of selective segmental transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior spinal fusion for degenerative lumbar scoliosis

1

Shen et al

2014

J Clinical Neuroscience

Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw instrumentation for single-level minimally invasivetransforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

1

Lim et al

2013

Korean Journal of Spine

Radiographic Results of Minimally Invasive (MIS) Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LIF) Compared with Conventional Lumbar Interbody Fusion

1

Lee et al

2014

JSDT

Learning Curve of a Complex Surgical Technique: Minimally Invasive TransforaminalLumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS TLIF).

1

Roh et al

2014

J Orthopaedic Surgery Research

Allogeneic morphogenetic protein vs. recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in lumbarinterbody fusion procedures: a radiographic and economic analysis

1

Eckman et al

2014

CORR

Same-day discharge after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a series of 808 cases

1

Nandyala et al

2014

Spine

Prospective, randomized, controlled trial of silicate-substituted calcium phosphate versus rhBMP-2 in a minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

1

Gu et al

2104

International Orthopaedics

Comparison of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in two-level degenerative lumbar disease

1

Adams et al

2014

Spine

Effectiveness and safety of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 versus local bone graft in primary lumbar interbody fusions.

1

Perez-Cruet et al

2014

Spine

Quality-of-life outcomes with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion based on long-term analysis of 304 consecutive patients

1

Seng et al

2013

Spine

Five-year outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a matched-pair comparison study

1

Park et al

2014

CORR

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis and degenerative spondylosis: 5-year results.

1

Zhang et al

2014

International Orthopaedics

Unilateral versus bilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in two-level degenerative lumbar disorders: a prospective randomised study

1

Silva et al

2013

Neurosurgical Focus

Learning curve and complications of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

1

Choi et al

2013

Neurosurgical Focus

Unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in minimally invasive transforaminallumbar interbody fusion

1

Sakeb et al

2013

Indian J Ortho

Comparison of the early results of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbarinterbody fusion in symptomatic lumbar instability

1

Jaquot et al

2013

International Orthopaedics

Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: is it worth it?

1

Hoy et al

2013

ESJ

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterolateral instrumented fusion (PLF) in degenerative lumbar disorders: a randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up.

1

Min et al

2013

TSJ

The clinical and radiological outcomes of multilevel minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbodyfusion

1

Kim et al

2012

JSDT

Instrumented Minimally Invasive spinal-Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF); Minimum 5-years Follow-up With Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes.

1

Wu et al

2012

Chinese Medicine Journal

Complications and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of one- or two-level degenerative disc diseases of the lumbar spine in patients older than 65 years.

1

Nagineni et al

2012

Spine

Silicate-substituted calcium phosphate ceramic bone graft replacement for spinal fusion procedures.

1

Wang et al

2014

JSDT

Comparison of the clinical outcome in overweight or obese patients after minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

1

Lee et al

2012

ESJ

Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbodyfusion

1

Burneikiene et al

2012

SNI

Complications in patients undergoing combined transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior instrumentation with deformity correction for degenerative scoliosis and spinal stenosis

1

Audat et al

2012

Singapore Medicine

Comparison of clinical and radiological results of posterolateral fusion, posterior lumbar interbodyfusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion techniques in the treatment of degenerative lumbarspine

1

Lee et al

2012

Spine

Learning curve and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: our experience in 86 consecutive cases

1

Tsahtsarlis et al

2012

Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and spondylolisthesis

1

Xue et al

2012

TSJ

Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative lumbar diseases

1

Kotil et al

2013

JSDT

Clinical and radiologic outcomes of TLIF applications with or without pedicle screw: a double center prospective pilot comparative study.

1

Li et al

2012

Acta Neurochi

The relation between zoledronic acid infusion and interbody fusion in patients undergoingtransforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surger

1

Villavicencio et al

2013

JSDT

Preliminary results on feasibility of outpatient instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

1

Takahashi et al

2011

Neurol medical chir

Clinical outcomes and adverse events following transforaminal interbody fusion for lumbardegenerative spondylolisthesis in elderly patients.

1

Park et al

2011

Asian J of Neurosurge

Surgical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of spondylolisthesis and degenerative segmental instability

1

Kaslial et al

2012

World Neurosurgery

Clinical and radiographic outcomes using local bone shavings as autograft in minimally invasivetransforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

1

Poh et al

2011

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery

Two-year outcomes of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

1

Blondel et al

2011

Orthopaedic Traumatology Surgery

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion through a unilateral approach and percutaneous osteosynthesis

1

Kim et al

2011

Asian Spine Journal

The clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody single level fusion.

1

Takahashi et al

2011

Neurol medical chir

Surgical outcome and postoperative work status of lumbar discogenic pain following transforaminalinterbody fusion

1

Lau et al

2011

J Clinical Neuroscience

Complications and perioperative factors associated with learning the technique of minimally invasivetransforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).

1

Lee et al

2010

J of Korean NS

Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using a Single Interbody Cage and a Tubular Retraction System : Technical Tips, and Perioperative, Radiologic and Clinical Outcome

1

Rouben et al

2011

JSDT

Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up

1

Wang et al

2011

ESJ

Minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for patients previously treated by open discectomy and decompression of the lumbar spine

1

Smith et al

2010

JNS Spine

Increased incidence of cage migration and nonunion in instrumented transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with bioabsorbable cages

1

Pan et al

2011

Spine

Spontaneous slip reduction of low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis following circumferential release via bilateral minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: technical note and short-term outcome
  1   2   3


The database is protected by copyright ©dentisty.org 2016
send message

    Main page