A pathfinder for Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Birthmark and Bioethics



Download 0.7 Mb.
Date27.01.2017
Size0.7 Mb.

A Pathfinder for Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Birthmark and Bioethics

Every source opens by hyperlink so place your mouse over any URL address or image and follow the pop-up instructions.



A note: Make sure you search as Nathaniel Hawthorne + The Birthmark” and “Bioethics” to narrow the search. Some bioethics analysis of Hawthorne’s short story “Rappaccini’s Daughter” may also apply to The Birthmark

To open any of these sites, place your mouse over the title and then press “Ctrl” and left click your mouse. Enter your search keyword(s) in the search box













eBooks

(eBook link is set for Bioethics

Open Directory Project

Intute

Being Human, Chapter 1 Hawthorne’s the Birthmark

Bioethics and medical issues in literature

PALS Nathaniel Hawthorne site (CSUS)




OPPOSING VIEWPOINTS IN BIOETHICS (BY SUBJECT)

Euthanasia

Eugenics

Stem Cell Research

Genetic Engineering

Animal Cloning

Human Cloning







SPECIALIST WEBSITES







Full Summary and Analysis of The Birthmark

The Birthmark Study Guide (ENotes)

President’s Council on Bioethics and The Birthmark







Neoconconservative Nathaniel:Bioethics and the Birthmark

Cloning Debate Bioethics and The Birthmark

Transcript of Council on Bioethics Meeting






Los Angeles Public Library

To access the site, place mouse on database icon or the title of the article, press “ctrl” and left click your mouse. Enter your library card number and password (always the last four digits of your home phone)

Nathaniel Hawthorne: Analysis of “The Birthmark” and “Rappaccini’s Daughter”


  1. "Hawthorne, Nathaniel (1804-1864)."UXL Junior DISCovering Authors. Online Detroit: UXL, 2003. Discovering Collection. Gale. .  

  2. "Impaled Butterflies and the Misleading Moral in Hawthornes Short Works."DISCovering Authors. Online Detroit: Gale, 2003. Discovering Collection. Gale. .  

  3. "Plot Summary: "The Birth Mark"."DISCovering Authors. Online Detroit: Gale, 2003. Discovering Collection. Gale. .  

  4. "The Birthmark." Short Story Criticism. Ed. Rachelle Mucha and Thomas J. Schoenberg. Vol. 89. Detroit: Gale, 2006. Literature Resources from Gale. Gale. Los Angeles Public Library.

  5. "The Birthmark: Overview." Reference Guide to Short Fiction. Ed. Noelle Watson. Detroit: St. James Press, Literature Resources from Gale. Gale. Los Angeles Public Library.

  6. Bischoff, Howard. "At the edge of contemplation." Journal of Evolutionary Psychology. (Mar. 2003): p1. Literature Resources from Gale. Gale. Los Angeles Public Library.

  7. di Pietro, Roberto. "Hawthorne's 'The Birthmark': Puritan Inhibitions and Romantic Appeal in the Context of the Faustian Quest." Studi e Ricerche Di Letteratura Inglese e Americana. 2.( 1972): 239-257. Rpt. in Short Story Criticism. Ed. Rachelle Mucha and Thomas J. Schoenberg. Vol. 89. Detroit: Gale, 2006. 239-257. Literature Resources from Gale. Gale. Los Angeles Public Library.

  8. Eckstein, Barbara. "Hawthorne's 'The Birthmark': Science and Romance as Belief." Studies in Short Fiction. 26.4 (Fall 1989): 511-519. Rpt. in Short Story Criticism. Ed. Rachelle Mucha and Thomas J. Schoenberg. Vol. 89. Detroit: Gale, 2006. 511-519. Literature Resources from Gale. Gale. Los Angeles Public Library.

  9. Explaining Mental Illness: Theology and Pathology in Nathaniel Hawthorne's Short Fiction, Eric Goldman, Nineteenth-Century Literature, Vol. 59, No. 1 (Jun., 2004), pp. 27-52. (JSTOR login required)

  10. Hawthorne's Allegory of Science: "Rappaccini's Daughter", Edward H. Rosenberry, American Literature, Vol. 32, No. 1 (Mar., 1960), pp. 39-46. (JSTOR login required)

  11. Horne, Lewis B. "The Heart, the Hand and 'The Birthmark.'." American Transcendental Quarterly. 1 ( 1969): 38-41. Rpt. in Short Story Criticism. Ed. Rachelle Mucha and Thomas J. Schoenberg. Vol. 89. Detroit: Gale, 2006. 38-41. Literature Resources from Gale. Gale. Los Angeles Public Library.

  12. Keeling, Thomas H. "Science Fiction and the Gothic." Bridges to Science Fiction. Ed. George E. Slusser, Mark Rose, and George R. Guffey Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1980. 107-119. Rpt. in Twentieth-Century Literary Criticism. Vol. 202. Detroit: Gale, 107-119. Literature Resources from Gale. Gale. Los Angeles Public Library.

  13. Medoro, Dana. ""Looking into their inmost nature": the speculum and sexual selection in "Rappaccini's daughter"." Nathaniel Hawthorne Review. (Vol. 35). .1 (Spring 2009): p70. Literature Resource Center. Gale. Los Angeles Public Library. 24 Jan. 2011

  14. McMurray, Price. "'Love Is as Much Its Demand, as Perception': Hawthorne's 'Birth-Mark' and Emerson's 'Humanity of Science.'." ESQ: A Journal of the American Renaissance. 47.1 ( 2001): 1-31. Rpt. in Short Story Criticism. Ed. Rachelle Mucha and Thomas J. Schoenberg. Vol. 89. Detroit: Gale, 2006. 1-31. Literature Resources from Gale. Gale. Los Angeles Public Library.

  15. Perfect Substitutes or the Real Thing?, Naomi Cahn, Duke Law Journal, Vol. 52, No. 6 (Apr., 2003), pp. 1077-1166. (JSTOR login required)

  16. Quinn, James and Ross Baldessarini. "'The Birth-Mark': A Deathmark." Hartford Studies in Literature. 13.2 ( 1981): 91-98. Rpt. in Short Story Criticism. Ed. Rachelle Mucha and Thomas J. Schoenberg. Vol. 89. Detroit: Gale, 2006. 91-98. Literature Resources from Gale. Gale. Los Angeles Public Library.

  17. Rosenberg, Liz. ""The best that earth could offer": "The Birth-mark," a newlywed's story." Studies in Short Fiction. 30.2 (Spring 1993): p145. Literature Resources from Gale. Gale. Los Angeles Public Library.

  18. Science and Art in Hawthorne's "The Birth-Mark", Mary E. Rucker, Nineteenth-Century Literature, Vol. 41, No. 4 (Mar., 1987), pp. 445-461. (JSTOR login required)

  19. Speaking of the Unspeakable: Hawthorne's "The Birthmark", Jules Zanger, Modern Philology, Vol. 80, No. 4 (May, 1983), pp. 364-371. (JSTOR login required)

  20. The Flower and the Fountain: Hawthorne's Chief Symbols in "Rappaccini's Daughter", Alfred J. Kloeckner, American Literature, Vol. 38, No. 3 (Nov., 1966), pp. 323-336. (JSTOR login required)

  21. Turner, Arlin, and Benjamin Franklin, V. "Nathaniel Hawthorne."DISCovering Authors. Online Detroit: Gale, 2003. Discovering Collection. Gale. .  

  22. Wentersdorf, Karl P. "The Genesis of Hawthorne's 'The Birthmark.'." Jahrbuch Für Amerikastudien. 8.( 1963): 171-186. Rpt. in Short Story Criticism. Ed. Rachelle Mucha and Thomas J. Schoenberg. Vol. 89. Detroit: Gale, 2006. 171-186. Literature Resources from Gale. Gale. Los Angeles Public Library.

  23. Youra, Steven. "'The Fatal Hand': A Sign of Confusion in Hawthorne's 'The Birth-Mark.'." American Transcendental Quarterly. 60 (June 1986): 43-51. Rpt. in Short Story Criticism. Ed. Rachelle Mucha and Thomas J. Schoenberg. Vol. 89. Detroit: Gale, 2006. 43-51. Literature Resources from Gale. Gale. Los Angeles Public Library.



GALE Opposing Viewpoints in Bioethics (by subject)

Euthanasia


  1. "Physician-Assisted Suicide Is Ethical." Ethics. Ed. Laurie DiMauro and Tina Grant. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2010. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  2. "Physician-Assisted Suicide Is Unethical." Ethics. Ed. Laurie DiMauro and Tina Grant. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2010. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  3. Geiger, Alois. "Assisted Suicide Is a Valid Medical Decision." The Right to Die. Ed. John Woodward. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2010. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  4. Hall, Allen. "Physician-Assisted Suicide Can Turn into a Profit Machine." The Right to Die. Ed. John Woodward. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2010. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  5. Jenkins, Simon. "People Have the Right to Die with Dignity." The Right to Die. Ed. John Woodward. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2010. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  6. José Pereira, Dominique Anwar, Gerard Pralong, Josianne Pralong, Claudia Mazzocato, and Jean-Michel Bigler. "Physician-Assisted Suicide Has No Place in Palliative Care." The Right to Die. Ed. John Woodward. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2010. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  7. Küng, Hans. "A Compassionate God Would Not Deny Euthanasia." The Right to Die. Ed. John Woodward. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2010. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)
    "Doctors and Nurses Should Never Take Part in Euthanasia." Medical Ethics. Noël Merino. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2010. Current Controversies. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  8. Marker, Rita. "Right-to-Die Laws Do Present a Slippery Slope." The Right to Die. Ed. John Woodward. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2010. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  9. Phifer, Kenneth W. "Religious and Spiritual Principles Lead to Support of Assisted Suicide." Assisted Suicide. Ed. Karen F. Balkin. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2009. Current Controversies. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  10. Richman, Sheldon. "Legalized Physician-Assisted Suicide Empowers Doctors, Not Patients." Assisted Suicide. Ed. Karen F. Balkin. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2009. Current Controversies. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  11. Singer, Peter. "Legalizing Assisted Suicide Prevents Harm to the Vulnerable." Assisted Suicide. Ed. Karen F. Balkin. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2009. Current Controversies. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  12. Somerville, Margaret. "Right-to-Die Laws Would Damage Society." The Right to Die. Ed. John Woodward. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2010. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  13. Wolf, Susan. "A Slow Death Is Better Than the Burden of Assisted Suicide." The Right to Die. Ed. John Woodward. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2010. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

Eugenics and Biotechnology


  1. "Biotechnology Can Find an Ethical Solution to the Stem Cell Debate." Embryonic and Adult Stem Cells. Ed. Margaret Haerens. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2009. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. ’ (LAPL login required)

  2. "Future Harms of Reproductive Technologies Are Worth Opposing Now." Reproductive Technologies. Ed. Clay Farris Naff. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2007. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context.

  3. "Humans Have a Right to Be Born Without Genetic Manipulation." Human Genetics. Ed. Noël Merino. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2010. Current Controversies. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context.

  4. "Parents Should Be Free to Use 'Designer Baby' Technologies." Reproductive Technologies. Ed. Clay Farris Naff. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2007. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context.

  5. "Religion Should Not Interfere in Bioethics." Reproductive Technologies. Ed. Clay Farris Naff. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2007. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  6. "Science Surrounding Genetic Testing for Psychiatric Disorders Is Still Evolving." Genetic Disorders. Ed. Katherine Swarts. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2009. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  7. "Society Should Restrict 'Designer Baby' Technologies." Reproductive Technologies. Ed. Clay Farris Naff. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2007. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context.

  8. Green, Ronald M. "Prenatal Gene Manipulation Has Many Advantages." The Washington Post (13 Apr. 2008): B1. Rpt. in Genetic Disorders. Ed. Katherine Swarts. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2009. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context.

  9. Mundy, Liza. "Disposing of Unused Frozen Embryos Poses Ethical Challenges." Reproductive Technology. Ed. Cindy Mur. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2010. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  10. Rae, Scott B. "Surrogate Motherhood Is Unethical." Biomedical Ethics. Ed. Roman Espejo. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2003. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  11. Sandel, Michael J. "The Selection of Offspring Traits Is Unethical." Biomedical Ethics. Ed. Viqi Wagner. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2008. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context.

  12. Sandel, Michael. "Genetically Designing Babies Is Unethical." Reproductive Technology. Ed. Cindy Mur. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2010. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context.

  13. Schneider, Jennifer. "Egg Donation Puts Donors at Risk." Reproductive Technology. Ed. Cindy Mur. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2010. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)


Stem Cell


  1. "Embryonic Stem Cell Research Is Ethical." Ethics. Ed. Laurie DiMauro and Tina Grant. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2006. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  2. "Embryonic Stem Cell Research Poses Ethical Considerations." Genetic Disorders. Ed. Katherine Swarts. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2009. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  3. "Embryos Deserve the Moral Status of Persons." Reproductive Technologies. Ed. Clay Farris Naff. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2007. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  4. Sandel, Michael J. "Embryos Do Not Deserve the Moral Status of Persons." New England Journal of Medicine 351 (15 July 2004): 207-209. Rpt. in Reproductive Technologies. Ed. Clay Farris Naff. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2007. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  5. "The Government Should Fund and Regulate Stem Cell Research." Should the Government Fund Embryonic Stem Cell Research? Ed. Amy Francis. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2009. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  6. "The Stem Cell Debate Is Over." Embryonic and Adult Stem Cells. Ed. Margaret Haerens. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2009. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  7. "Stem Cell Research Is Vital to Finding Cures for Genetic Disorders." Genetic Disorders. Ed. Katherine Swarts. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2009. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  8. George, Robert P. "Stem Cells Should Not Be Harvested from Artificially Grown Fetuses." The Weekly Standard (3 Oct. 2005). Rpt. in Stem Cells. Ed. Jacqueline Langwith. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2007. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  9. Hall, Amy Laura. "Embryonic Stem Cell Research Is Unethical." Christian Century 121 (1 June 2004): 8. Rpt. in Genetic Engineering. Ed. James D. Torr. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2006. Current Controversies. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

Genetic Engineering or Enhancement


  1. "Extending the Human Lifespan Is a Moral Imperative." How Far Should Science Extend the Human Lifespan? Ed. Tamara Thompson. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2009. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  2. "Gene Patents Create Social and Economic Problems." Human Genetics. Ed. Noël Merino. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2010. Current Controversies. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  3. "Human Genome Research Will Benefit Society." Biomedical Ethics. Ed. Roman Espejo. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2003. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  4. Ho, Mae-Wan. "Human Genome Research Will Not Benefit Society." Biomedical Ethics. Ed. Roman Espejo. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2003. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  5. "Life-Extension Technologies Can Be Misused." How Far Should Science Extend the Human Lifespan? Ed. Tamara Thompson. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2009. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  6. Lippman, Abby. "Postmenopausal Pregnancies Should Be Banned." Biomedical Ethics. Ed. Roman Espejo. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2003. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  7. "Genes Should Not Be Patented." Human Genetics. Ed. Noël Merino. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2010. Current Controversies. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  8. Newman, Stuart A. "Genetically Enhancing Children Violates Human Rights." Genetic Engineering. Ed. James D. Torr. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2006. Current Controversies. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  9. Coates, Joseph F., John B. Mahaffie, and Andy Hines. "Genetic Engineering Could Benefit Society." Biomedical Ethics. Ed. Roman Espejo. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2003. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  10. Plotz, David. "Genetic Enhancement Is Ethical for Adults but Not for Children." Slate (12 Mar. 2003). Rpt. in Genetic Engineering. Ed. Sylvia Engdahl. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2006. Contemporary Issues Companion. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  11. "Genetic Enhancement Should Be Left to Personal Choice." Human Genetics. Ed. Noël Merino. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2010. Current Controversies. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  12. "Genetic Enhancement Should Only Be Limited by Regulations for Safety and Efficacy." Human Genetics. Ed. Noël Merino. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2010. Current Controversies. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  13. King, David. "Human Genetic Engineering Is Risky and Should Be Stopped." Genetic Engineering. Ed. Louise I. Gerdes. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2009. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  14. "Humans Have a Right to Be Born Without Genetic Manipulation." Human Genetics. Ed. Noël Merino. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2010. Current Controversies. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  15. M, Lawrence. "Postmenopausal Pregnancies Should Be Permitted." Are Some Parents Too Old? Age Restrictions in Postmenopausal Pregnancies and Adoptions. Rpt. in Biomedical Ethics. Ed. Roman Espejo. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2003. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  16. Green, Ronald M. "Prenatal Gene Manipulation Has Many Advantages." The Washington Post (13 Apr. 2008): B1. Rpt. in Genetic Disorders. Ed. Katherine Swarts. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2009. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  17. Ponnuru, Ramesh. "Prenatal Testing for Genetic Disorders Dehumanizes All Who Have Disorders." The Human Life Review 32 (Spring 2006): 29+. Rpt. in Genetic Disorders. Ed. Katherine Swarts. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2009. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

Human Cloning


  1. "Cloning Is Immoral." Ethics. Ed. Laurie DiMauro and Tina Grant. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2006. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  2. "Cloning Is Moral." Ethics. Ed. Laurie DiMauro and Tina Grant. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2006. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  3. "Human Cloning Will Be Accepted When It Is Safe and Effective." The Ethics of Cloning. Ed. David M. Haugen, Susan Musser, and Kacy Lovelace. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2009. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  4. "Reproductive Cloning Would Strengthen the American Family." The Ethics of Cloning. Ed. David M. Haugen, Susan Musser, and Kacy Lovelace. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2009. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  5. "Reproductive Cloning Would Strengthen the American Family." The Ethics of Cloning. Ed. David M. Haugen, Susan Musser, and Kacy Lovelace. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2009. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  6. "Therapeutic Cloning to Obtain Embryonic Stem Cells Is Immoral." Stem Cells. Ed. Jacqueline Langwith. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2007. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  7. "Therapeutic Cloning to Obtain Embryonic Stem Cells Is Not Immoral." Stem Cells. Ed. Jacqueline Langwith. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2007. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  8. Davis, Dena S. "Therapeutic Cloning Is Not a Form of Abortion." The Abortion Controversy. Ed. Emma Bernay. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2007. Current Controversies. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  9. Doerflinger, Richard M. "Human Cloning Is Unethical." Genetic Engineering. Ed. James D. Torr. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2006. Current Controversies. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  10. Kass, Leon R. "Human Cloning Should Be Banned." Weekly Standard 13 (25 Feb. 2008). Rpt. in The Ethics of Cloning. Ed. David M. Haugen, Susan Musser, and Kacy Lovelace. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2009. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  11. Kass, Leon R. "Human Cloning Should Be Banned." Weekly Standard 13 (25 Feb. 2008). Rpt. in The Ethics of Cloning. Ed. David M. Haugen, Susan Musser, and Kacy Lovelace. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2009. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  12. Kass, Leon R. "The Government Should Ban Therapeutic Cloning." Techology and Society. Ed. David Haugen and Susan Musser. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2007. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  13. Mott, Maryann. "The Ethical Concerns of Adding Human Cells to Genetically Modified Animals." National Geographic News (25 Jan. 2005). Rpt. in Genetic Engineering. Ed. Sylvia Engdahl. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2006. Contemporary Issues Companion. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  14. Smith, Wesley J. "Human Cloning Should Be Banned." National Right to Life News (Jan. 2004). Rpt. in Genetic Engineering. Ed. James D. Torr. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2006. Current Controversies. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  15. Wright, Wendy. "Human Cloning Should Be Banned." Genetic Engineering. Ed. Louise I. Gerdes. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2009. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

Animal Cloning and Experimentation


  1. "Using Primates in Medical Experimentation Is Unjustifiable." Animal Experimentation. Ed. Cindy Mur. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2009. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  2. Aid, Animal. "Nonhuman Primates Should Not Be Used in Experiments." 2003. Rpt. in Animal Experimentation. Ed. Cindy Mur. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2004. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  3. Allen, Arthur. "Using Animals for Medical Testing May Be Wrong for Scientific Rather than Ethical Reasons." Slate (1 June 2006). Rpt. in The Rights of Animals. Ed. Auriana Ojeda. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2004. Current Controversies. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  4. Brown, Stephanie. "Using Animals as Organ Donors Endangers Human Lives." Animal Experimentation. Ed. Cindy Mur. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2004. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  5. Carlin, David R. "Animals Are Not Entitled to Rights." Animal Experimentation. Ed. Cindy Mur. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2004. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  6. Croatia, Animal Friends. "Animal Experimentation Is Not Ethical." Animal Experimentation. Ed. Cindy Mur. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2009. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  7. Derbyshire, Stuart W.G. "Animal Experimentation Is Ethical." The Scientist 20 (Feb. 2006): 23. Rpt. in Animal Experimentation. Ed. Cindy Mur. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2004. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  8. Epstein, Alex. "Human Well-Being Requires the Use of Animals for Medical Research." San Diego Business Journal 26 (22 Aug. 2005): 46-47. Rpt. in The Rights of Animals. Ed. Auriana Ojeda. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2004. Current Controversies. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  9. Foundation for Biomedical Research. "Animal Experimentation Is Vital for Medical Research." Animal Experimentation. Ed. Cindy Mur. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2009. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  10. Gordon, Meg. "Cloned Animals May Suffer." New Scientist (26 Apr. 1997). Rpt. in Cloning. Ed. Sylvia Engdahl. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2006. Contemporary Issues Companion. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  11. Greek, C. Ray, and Jean Swigle Greek. "Animal Drug Tests Do Not Benefit Humans." The Rights of Animals. Ed. Auriana Ojeda. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2004. Current Controversies. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  12. Howard, Carol. "Alternative Testing Can Replace Animal Experimentation." AV Magazine CXIII (Spring 2005): 14-15. Rpt. in Animal Experimentation. Ed. Cindy Mur. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2004. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  13. Locke, Edwin A. "Animals Should Not Be Given Rights at the Expense of Human Needs." Intellectual Conservative (2 June 2005). Rpt. in The Rights of Animals. Ed. Auriana Ojeda. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2004. Current Controversies. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  14. Morell, Virginia. "Cloning Monkeys: Are Humans Next?" Discover (May 1998). Rpt. in Cloning. Ed. Sylvia Engdahl. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2006. Contemporary Issues Companion. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  15. Poste, George. "Alternative Testing Cannot Replace Animal Experimentation." Arizona Republic (3 Sept. 2006). Rpt. in Animal Experimentation. Ed. Cindy Mur. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2004. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  16. Regan, Tom. "Animals Are Entitled to Rights." Animal Experimentation. Ed. Cindy Mur. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2004. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  17. Rifkin, Jeremy. "Genetic Engineering Is Cruel to Animals." Genetic Engineering. Ed. James D. Torr. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2002. Current Controversies. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  18. Sapontzis, S.F. "Animal Experimentation Is Unethical." Do Animals Have Rights? Ed. Jamuna Carroll. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2005. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  19. Seriously Ill for Medical Research. "The World's Major Religions Support Animal Experimentation." Animal Experimentation. Ed. Helen Cothran. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2002. Opposing Viewpoints. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  20. Society, Research Defence. "Using Monkeys in Medical Experimentation Is Justifiable." Animal Experimentation. Ed. Cindy Mur. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2009. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  21. Solomon, Gina. "Chemical Testing on Animals Saves Lives." Earth Island Journal 17 (Autumn 2002): 47-49. Rpt. in Animal Experimentation. Ed. Cindy Mur. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2004. At Issue. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

  22. Wilmut, Ian. "Animal Cloning Experiments Will Benefit Humans." The Rights of Animals. Ed. Auriana Ojeda. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 1999. Current Controversies. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. (LAPL login required)

Directory: UserFiles -> Servers -> Server 20226865 -> File -> Library -> Past%20Projects
Past%20Projects -> A pathfinder for Autobiographies and Biographies
Library -> Note: Please look through resources very carefully. This is a controversial issue so some sources may have bias. Check carefully for the expertise or background of the writer or contributor
Library -> Note: Please look through resources very carefully. This is a controversial issue so some sources may have bias. Check carefully for the expertise or background of the writer or contributor. To Link to any article
Past%20Projects -> Focus: “Inquiring Minds Want to Know!!”
Library -> Note: Please look through resources very carefully. This is a controversial issue so some sources may have bias. Check carefully for the expertise or background of the writer or contributor
Library -> Note: Please look through resources very carefully. This is a controversial issue so some sources may have bias. Check carefully for the expertise or background of the writer or contributor. To Link to any article
Library -> Note: Please look through resources very carefully. This is a controversial issue so some sources may have bias. Check carefully for the expertise or background of the writer or contributor
Past%20Projects -> A pathfinder for Latin American Social Issues and Welfare (apsl 2014)
Past%20Projects -> Vapa theatre Theatrical History


Share with your friends:


The database is protected by copyright ©dentisty.org 2019
send message

    Main page